UP indigenous science systems · 18 min read · 3,467 words

Aboriginal Dreamtime as a Physics Model: Songlines, Information Fields, and 65,000 Years of Continuous Knowledge

In 1915, Albert Einstein published his field equations of general relativity, describing how matter curves spacetime and spacetime tells matter how to move. The geometry of the universe, Einstein showed, is not a fixed stage on which events play out but a dynamic, participatory fabric shaped by...

By William Le, PA-C

Aboriginal Dreamtime as a Physics Model: Songlines, Information Fields, and 65,000 Years of Continuous Knowledge

Language: en


The Oldest Science on Earth

In 1915, Albert Einstein published his field equations of general relativity, describing how matter curves spacetime and spacetime tells matter how to move. The geometry of the universe, Einstein showed, is not a fixed stage on which events play out but a dynamic, participatory fabric shaped by the presence of everything within it.

Sixty-five thousand years before Einstein picked up his chalk, the Aboriginal peoples of Australia had already encoded a strikingly similar insight into their cosmology. They called it the Dreaming — Jukurrpa in Warlpiri, Tjukurpa in Pitjantjatjara, Altjeringa in Aranda — and it described a living information field that underlies, generates, and sustains all of physical reality. The Dreaming is not a dream in the Western sense. It is not something that happens during sleep or in the mind of an individual. It is the foundational layer of reality itself: the code beneath the surface, the pattern behind the form, the operating system running the hardware of the material world.

Aboriginal Australians are not primitive peoples who happened to survive for 65,000 years through luck. They are the inheritors of the longest continuous knowledge tradition in human history — a tradition that, when examined with the tools of modern physics, contains insights so profound that Western science is only now catching up.

This is not mysticism dressed up in scientific language. This is a rigorous comparison of two knowledge systems that arrived at remarkably convergent descriptions of reality through entirely different methods — one through mathematics and particle accelerators, the other through direct contemplative engagement with the land, enacted across millennia of unbroken cultural transmission.

The Dreaming: An Information Field Model of Reality

The Dreaming is not a creation myth in the Western sense — a one-time event that happened “in the beginning” and then stopped. In Aboriginal cosmology, the Dreaming is always happening. It is the eternal present that generates the temporal world. Ancestral beings — the Rainbow Serpent, the Emu, the Seven Sisters, the Lightning Brothers — did not create the world in the past and then retire. They are still creating it, continuously, in every moment. The landscape is their body. The rivers are their tracks. The rocks are where they rested. The sacred sites are where the power of creation is most concentrated.

This is not metaphor. For Aboriginal Australians, this is literally how reality works.

Now consider how physicist David Bohm described the structure of reality. In his 1980 work “Wholeness and the Implicate Order,” Bohm proposed that the visible, measurable universe — what he called the explicate order — is a surface manifestation of a deeper, hidden dimension he called the implicate order. In the implicate order, everything is enfolded into everything else. Separation is an illusion. The entire universe is contained in every part, like a hologram where each fragment contains the whole image.

The parallels are striking:

The Dreaming is the implicate order — the deep, timeless, nonlocal field from which all physical forms emerge. The physical landscape — rocks, rivers, animals, plants, weather — is the explicate order, the unfolded manifestation of the Dreaming’s patterns. Ancestral beings are the formative principles — the mathematical relationships, the symmetry-breaking events, the attractors in phase space — that give the universe its particular structure. Sacred sites are points where the implicate order is most accessible — where the boundary between the deep field and the surface manifestation is thinnest.

Bohm arrived at his implicate order through quantum mechanics, specifically through his work on nonlocality and the EPR paradox. Aboriginal Australians arrived at the Dreaming through 65,000 years of direct, sustained, embodied engagement with the natural world. The convergence is not coincidence. It reflects the possibility that both approaches — the mathematical-experimental and the contemplative-ecological — are detecting the same underlying architecture of reality.

Songlines: Geodesic Navigation Encoded in Narrative

If the Dreaming is the information field, then Songlines are its access protocol.

Songlines — also called dreaming tracks or song paths — are an extraordinary achievement of human cognition. They are navigational routes that crisscross the entire Australian continent, encoded not in maps or written directions but in songs. Each Songline is a musical journey that describes the travels of an ancestral being across the landscape during the Dreaming. The lyrics name landmarks, water sources, food locations, and sacred sites. The rhythm and melody encode distance and terrain. By singing the appropriate Songline, an Aboriginal person can navigate across hundreds or thousands of kilometers of desert, forest, and coast — including through territory they have never physically visited.

Bruce Chatwin documented this system in his 1987 book “The Songlines,” bringing it to Western attention for the first time. But Chatwin, a literary traveler, only scratched the surface. Subsequent work by anthropologists and Aboriginal scholars has revealed that the Songline network is far more sophisticated than Chatwin realized.

Consider what a Songline actually is from an information-theory perspective. It is a geodesic — the shortest path between two points on a curved surface — encoded in narrative form. The “curved surface” is not abstract spacetime but the physical topology of the Australian landscape. The “narrative form” is not a crude mnemonic but an extraordinarily efficient data compression algorithm. A single Songline can encode:

  • Precise geographic coordinates of water sources, food plants, and shelter locations
  • Seasonal timing information (when certain resources are available)
  • Ecological data (which species are present, their behaviors, their relationships)
  • Geological and meteorological information (flood patterns, fire cycles, drought indicators)
  • Social and kinship data (which clan groups have custodianship of which segments)
  • Spiritual and ceremonial protocols (which rituals must be performed at which sites)

All of this is compressed into a song that can be memorized and transmitted orally with high fidelity across generations. The Aboriginal Songline network is, in information-theory terms, a continent-spanning distributed database — a geographic information system encoded in music and maintained through ritual performance.

The closest Western analogy is GPS — the Global Positioning System that uses 31 satellites orbiting at 20,200 kilometers to triangulate positions on Earth’s surface. Aboriginal Australians built an equivalent system using the human brain, voice, and thousands of years of accumulated observation, and they did it without launching a single satellite.

The Holographic Principle and the Dreaming

In 1993, physicist Gerard ‘t Hooft proposed the holographic principle, later developed by Leonard Susskind and Juan Maldacena. The holographic principle states that all the information contained within a volume of space can be encoded on the boundary surface of that space. A three-dimensional reality can be fully described by a two-dimensional information surface. The universe, in this view, is a hologram — a lower-dimensional information pattern that generates the appearance of higher-dimensional reality.

This principle, which emerged from black hole thermodynamics and string theory, has become one of the most important ideas in theoretical physics. Maldacena’s 1997 AdS/CFT correspondence — a mathematical proof that a five-dimensional gravitational theory is exactly equivalent to a four-dimensional quantum field theory on its boundary — is the most cited paper in the history of high-energy physics.

Now consider the Aboriginal understanding of sacred sites. In Aboriginal cosmology, certain locations in the landscape are points of heightened Dreaming power — places where ancestral beings performed particularly potent creative acts. These sites are not randomly distributed. They form networks, connected by Songlines, and the entire network constitutes a kind of information surface laid across the land.

At each sacred site, the full power and meaning of the Dreaming is present. The site is not merely a historical marker (“something happened here long ago”). It is a living portal where the deep structure of reality — the Dreaming — is directly accessible. Through ceremony, song, and ritual engagement at these sites, Aboriginal people access the same creative power that originally generated the physical world.

This is holographic encoding. The information of the whole (the Dreaming) is present at each point (the sacred site). The two-dimensional surface of the landscape encodes the full dimensionality of the Dreaming reality. Every part contains the whole.

When physicist Brian Greene explained the holographic principle to popular audiences, he used the analogy of a holographic sticker — scratch any part and you still see the whole image. Aboriginal Australians have been living this principle for 65,000 years. Their sacred sites are the “scratches” on the landscape hologram, each one revealing the complete Dreaming that underlies all of physical reality.

Nonlocality and the Dreaming

One of the most disorienting features of quantum mechanics is nonlocality — the experimentally verified fact that particles that have interacted remain correlated regardless of the distance between them. Measure one particle and the other instantly “knows” the result, even if they are on opposite sides of the universe. Einstein famously called this “spooky action at a distance” and spent years trying to prove it was impossible. John Bell’s 1964 theorem and Alain Aspect’s 1982 experiments proved Einstein wrong. Nonlocality is real.

In the Dreaming, there is no distance. All places are connected through the ancestral beings whose journeys link them. A ceremony performed at a sacred site in Western Australia can affect conditions at a connected site in Queensland, not because of any physical mechanism but because in the Dreaming dimension, those sites are the same place — or more precisely, they are different expressions of the same ancestral reality.

Aboriginal Australians maintained communication networks across the entire continent long before European contact. Messages, ceremonies, trade goods, and knowledge passed through Songline networks with remarkable efficiency. When European settlers encountered this network, they were baffled by how Aboriginal groups in remote locations already knew about events that had happened hundreds of kilometers away, often before any physical messenger could have traveled that distance.

The standard anthropological explanation is that the Aboriginal communication network was simply very efficient — runners, smoke signals, message sticks. And this is partly true. But Aboriginal elders consistently describe an additional layer: the Dreaming itself functions as a communication medium. When ceremony is performed correctly at a sacred site, the information travels through the Dreaming to all connected sites simultaneously.

Whether one interprets this literally or metaphorically, the structural parallel with quantum nonlocality is unmistakable. Both systems describe a reality in which connection does not require physical proximity, in which information can be correlated across vast distances, and in which the fundamental layer of reality is one of interconnection rather than separation.

Time in the Dreaming: The Eternal Present

Western physics has undergone a radical revision of its understanding of time. In Newtonian mechanics, time was absolute — a universal clock ticking uniformly for all observers. Einstein’s relativity revealed that time is relative, flexible, dependent on speed and gravity. And in quantum mechanics, the most fundamental equations — the Schrödinger equation, the Wheeler-DeWitt equation — are time-symmetric or timeless. The physicist Julian Barbour, in his 1999 book “The End of Time,” argued that time does not exist at the most fundamental level of reality. What we experience as the passage of time is an emergent property of a timeless quantum configuration space.

Aboriginal Dreamtime cosmology has always described time this way. The Dreaming is not in the past. It is not a historical epoch that occurred and then ended. The Dreaming is the eternal present — the timeless dimension that continuously generates the temporal world. “The Dreaming” is a misleading English translation because it implies something that happens while sleeping or something that happened long ago. A more accurate translation would be “the Eternal” or “the Underlying” — the timeless substrate from which all temporal events emerge.

Aboriginal elders describe the Dreaming as always present, always accessible, always creating. When a person walks a Songline and sings the appropriate songs, they are not commemorating past events. They are participating in the ongoing creative activity of the Dreaming. The ancestral beings are not dead. They did not live “once upon a time.” They are still present in the land, in the water, in the sky, in the ceremony.

This is not a naive or prescientific confusion between past and present. It is a sophisticated cosmological framework that describes exactly what modern physics suggests: the most fundamental level of reality is timeless, and what we experience as temporal sequence is an emergent phenomenon generated by a deeper, atemporal order.

The Observer and the Observed: Participatory Reality

In the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the act of observation plays a constitutive role in determining physical reality. Before measurement, a quantum system exists in a superposition of all possible states. The act of measurement “collapses” the wave function into a definite outcome. Reality, in this interpretation, is not fully determined until it is observed.

John Archibald Wheeler took this further with his concept of the “participatory universe” — the idea that observers are not passive witnesses to reality but active participants in its creation. Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment demonstrated that the observer’s choice of measurement can apparently affect the past behavior of a particle, suggesting that the boundary between observer and observed, between subject and object, is far more porous than classical physics assumed.

Aboriginal cosmology is explicitly participatory. The land does not simply exist as a passive backdrop for human activity. The land must be sung into continued existence. If the Songlines are not maintained — if the ceremonies are not performed, the songs not sung, the sites not visited — the land itself deteriorates. The Dreaming needs human participation to sustain the physical world.

This is often dismissed by Western observers as magical thinking. But consider it in Wheeler’s framework. If observation participates in the creation of reality, and if consciousness is not epiphenomenal but constitutive, then Aboriginal ceremony — which is a concentrated, ritually structured form of conscious attention directed at the landscape — may be doing exactly what Aboriginal people say it does: maintaining the world through participatory engagement.

The fact that Aboriginal people have maintained the ecological health of Australia for 65,000 years through fire-stick farming, Songline-based land management, and ceremonial relationship with the landscape suggests that their “participatory reality” model is not just philosophy. It works.

65,000 Years of Knowledge Transmission

The Aboriginal knowledge system represents the longest continuously maintained body of knowledge in human history. To put this in perspective: the oldest written records are approximately 5,000 years old (Sumerian cuneiform). The Scientific Revolution began approximately 400 years ago. Modern physics is approximately 120 years old. Aboriginal Australian knowledge has been continuously transmitted for at least 65,000 years — confirmed by archaeological evidence from Madjedbebe rock shelter in the Northern Territory, dated in 2017 by a team led by Chris Clarkson.

How is this possible? How can a culture maintain detailed, accurate knowledge across 3,000+ generations without writing?

The answer lies in the extraordinary information technology of the Songline system. Songlines are not casual stories that drift and mutate over time. They are precision instruments maintained through rigorous protocols:

Ceremonial performance. Songlines are performed in ceremony, not told casually. The ceremonial context ensures full attention, emotional engagement, and social accountability. Errors are detected and corrected in real time by senior knowledge holders.

Distributed custodianship. No single person or group holds an entire Songline. Sections are distributed across multiple clan groups, each responsible for maintaining their segment with absolute fidelity. This creates a system of mutual verification — each group’s segment must interface correctly with the adjacent segments.

Multimodal encoding. Songlines encode information in multiple channels simultaneously: melody, rhythm, lyrics, dance movements, sand drawings, body painting, and ritual objects. This multimodal encoding creates redundancy that protects against information loss.

Landscape anchoring. The information is anchored to physical features of the landscape — rocks, waterholes, hills, trees — that serve as stable reference points persisting across millennia. The landscape itself is the hard drive on which the data is stored.

The result is a knowledge transmission system of extraordinary fidelity. In 2015, a team led by Patrick Nunn at the University of the Sunshine Coast published research showing that Aboriginal oral traditions contain accurate descriptions of sea-level changes that occurred more than 7,000 years ago — the flooding of coastal landscapes at the end of the last Ice Age. These descriptions are consistent with the geological record, meaning that Aboriginal oral traditions have preserved scientifically accurate geographic information across at least 7,000 years and possibly much longer.

No other human knowledge system has achieved anything remotely comparable.

The Fire-Stick and the Algorithm: Aboriginal Land Management as Applied Physics

Aboriginal Australians did not merely observe the landscape. They actively managed it through one of the most sophisticated environmental engineering programs in human history: fire-stick farming.

Through carefully controlled burning of specific areas at specific times — encoded in Songlines and governed by Dreaming knowledge — Aboriginal people maintained a mosaic landscape of different vegetation types and successional stages. This created:

  • Maximum biodiversity (different species thrive in different stages of vegetation regrowth)
  • Consistent food supply (different burned areas produce food at different times)
  • Reduced wildfire risk (small controlled burns prevent catastrophic bushfires)
  • Enhanced water availability (burned areas increase water runoff to streams and waterholes)
  • Navigable landscape (open understory from regular burning allows easy travel)

The fire-stick farming system was, in computational terms, an algorithm — a set of precise, conditional instructions (if this vegetation type, at this season, with this wind direction, then burn this area in this pattern) that transformed the landscape into a managed, productive system. The algorithm was encoded in the Dreaming and transmitted through Songlines, meaning that fire-stick farming was not a simple technology but an applied expression of an entire cosmological framework.

When European settlers disrupted Aboriginal fire management, the results were catastrophic. The buildup of unburned vegetation led to massive, uncontrollable wildfires — the kind Australia now experiences with increasing frequency and severity. The 2019-2020 Black Summer bushfires burned over 46 million acres and killed an estimated 3 billion animals. Aboriginal people across Australia pointed out that this was exactly what happens when you stop listening to the Dreaming.

Bill Gammage’s 2011 book “The Biggest Estate on Earth” documented how Aboriginal fire management had transformed the entire continent into what was essentially a managed park. The “pristine wilderness” that European settlers thought they had discovered was actually a 65,000-year-old engineering project.

Convergence, Not Coincidence

It would be easy to dismiss the parallels between Aboriginal Dreamtime and modern physics as superficial pattern-matching — reading quantum mechanics into indigenous mythology. But the convergence is too precise, too structural, and too consistent to be accidental.

Both systems describe reality as having two layers: a deep, nonlocal, timeless order and a surface world of separated objects and temporal events. Both systems describe the deep layer as more fundamental than the surface layer. Both systems describe the relationship between the two layers as one of continuous generation — the deep order is always creating the surface world. Both systems describe participation and observation as playing a constitutive role in determining physical reality. Both systems describe information as more fundamental than matter — the universe is built from patterns and relationships, not from “stuff.”

The difference is in method. Physics uses mathematics, controlled experiments, and technology to probe the deep structure of reality. Aboriginal Australians used sustained contemplative attention, ecological engagement, and ceremonial practice. Physics has been at it for about 400 years. Aboriginal Australians have been at it for 65,000 years.

Perhaps the most important lesson from this comparison is not that Aboriginal people “already knew” what physics discovered. That framing still privileges Western science as the standard by which indigenous knowledge is measured. The deeper lesson is that reality is accessible through multiple methods, and that some of those methods — particularly those based on sustained, embodied, participatory engagement with the natural world — may access dimensions of reality that mathematical physics, for all its power, has not yet reached.

The Dreaming is not a metaphor for the implicate order. The implicate order is a mathematical approximation of the Dreaming. The Aboriginal Australians got there first, went deeper, and stayed longer. Western physics is the newcomer, just beginning to glimpse what 65,000 years of continuous investigation has always known.

The oldest science on Earth may still be the most advanced.


This article synthesizes Aboriginal Australian cosmology with modern theoretical physics. Key references include David Bohm’s “Wholeness and the Implicate Order” (1980), Bruce Chatwin’s “The Songlines” (1987), Bill Gammage’s “The Biggest Estate on Earth” (2011), Patrick Nunn’s research on Aboriginal oral traditions and sea-level change, Chris Clarkson’s 2017 dating of Madjedbebe rock shelter, Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind’s holographic principle, and Julian Barbour’s “The End of Time” (1999).

Researchers